ResourcesMagnetic Gripper Buyer Resources
Selection guides for integrators, OEM builders, and manufacturing teams comparing magnetic grippers, magnetic EOAT, and custom robot tooling.
These resources are written as buyer-side decision aids. Use them to prepare supplier questions, compare gripper types, define validation gates, and avoid quote loops caused by missing workpiece or robot-interface data.
cobot gripper
Cobot Gripper Selection Guide for Magnetic EOAT
A practical guide for deciding when a magnetic cobot gripper fits ferromagnetic part handling, what to validate before quotation, and what to send for OEM review.
Robot integrators, manufacturing engineers, and OEM equipment builders using collaborative robots for ferromagnetic workpieces.
- Best for ferromagnetic parts where compact tooling, simple pickup, and low moving mass matter.
- Not a universal replacement for vacuum, soft, or finger grippers; material, air gap, coating, and release behavior decide fit.
- OEM review should include robot model, flange, payload margin, workpiece data, cable route, and validation criteria.
Read guideabb gripper
ABB Gripper Integration Guide for Magnetic EOAT
A practical checklist for specifying magnetic grippers on ABB industrial or collaborative robots, covering flange, payload, tool data, I/O, RobotStudio planning, and RFQ inputs for custom EOAT review.
Robot integrators, manufacturing engineers, and OEM equipment builders using ABB IRB, GoFa, SWIFTI, or other ABB robot platforms for ferromagnetic part handling.
- Best used as an ABB robot gripper review checklist, not as a claim that every magnetic EOAT is an official ABB accessory.
- Useful when the ABB cell handles ferromagnetic workpieces and needs a custom adapter plate, cable route, I/O plan, or release sequence.
- RFQ review should include robot model, controller, flange, payload margin, tool center, workpiece data, cycle target, and validation criteria.
Read guide